Search

TheGovfreak

My rants and raves about Business, Social Media and Public Relations, with a little Government stuff thrown in for fun

Weighing in on candidates economic policies

I have avoided weighing in on the 2016 Presidential campaign up until now because I thought Republicans would snap out of their unexplainable worship of Donald Trump and that the progressive movement would win out over the status quo of Hillary Clinton. I was wrong on both points.

Worship of Trump on the part of his supporters has reached a nasty, fever-pitch and the now-exposed internal DNC effort to block Bernie Sander’s campaign at every turn has now been made public; with little effect on the nomination of Clinton.

So, we are left with the lesser of two evils between the two major candidates. And if this is all we have to choose from, understanding their economic policies is of utmost importance when making a decision on who to vote for.

Yes, there are third-party candidates – Gary Johnson, Jill Stein, etc., and their policies are just as important and I may focus on them in the future. But unfortunately, we live in a duopoly of parties and the Republicans and Democrats suck the air out of any alternatives still out there.

So where do the major party candidates stand on the economy. Clinton is easier to figure, since she is a seasoned politician and gets that she needs to have policy papers available on her website and she needs to speak about the issue in live appearances with actual facts and figures.

Trump, on the other hand, is bravado who simply says he alone will make the economy better – bigger and better, so big we won’t know what to do with all the money that will be coming our way. His actual policy white papers on this subject are light on the subject, except for making our allies to start paying up for military protection and eliminating trade agreements that he feels steal jobs from hard-working Americans.

Clinton’s Economic Plan

  • Unlocking access to capital: Clinton would like to ease the regulatory burdens on s1454104868100-clinton43mall community banks and boost funding programs that support small businesses in underserved communities.“It is wrong that it is so easy for big corporations to get a break but so hard for small businesses even to get a loan,” Clinton told a crowd in Iowa. “It shouldn’t take longer to start a business in America than it does in Canada and France.”  If she is sincere on this, it’s a good start, but will those regulation eases also apply to her big time friends at banks like Goldman-Sachs?
  • Cutting red tape: Americans smallest business – those with one to five employees- spend 150 hours annually and $1,100 per employee making sure they comply with federal tax laws. That’s 20 times higher than Clinton’s large firm contributors. She would like to simplify the tax process and provide targeted relief to small business.
  • Opening new markets: This is Clinton’s plan to invest in American infrastructure. She says we need to invest in the Internet, roads, bridges, ports, and airports that make it easier for small businesses to reach new customers, and encourage innovations that unlock new markets for small business. She feels that this will open up markets across America and even the world. However, remember Obama’s stimulus for infrastructure investment where most of it went to unions and cities that used it to plug up budget shortfalls.
  • Making sure small businesses get paid – not stiffed: In a direct attack on The Donald, Clinton would like to assure that big businesses like Trump Enterprises will not build their fortunes by repeatedly stiffing the small businesses and contractors that do the actual work for them. She has a plan to go after unscrupulous big businesses that repeatedly stiff small business and giving small businesses the recourse to fight back.
  • Supporting small-business owners and entrepreneurs: Clinton wants to develop small business incubators, mentoring, and training to 50,000 entrepreneurs and small-business owners in underserved communities across the country.

Trump also has an economic plan that is shorter than Clinton’s but it has the support of 60 percent of small business owners that were asked in a Manta poll.

“Entrepreneurs relate to Donald Trump because, like him, we write our own narrative. We turn conflict into opportunity,” said Cherie Corso, owner of G2 Organics, in Manta’s findings.

Trump’s Economic Plan

  • Tax reform: “No business of any size, from a Fortune 500 to a mom-and-pop shop to a freelancer living job to job,trump will pay more than 15 percent of their business income in taxes. This lower tax rate makes corporate inversion unnecessary by making America’s tax rate one of the best in the world,” Trump says on his website. “This lower tax rate cannot be for big business alone; it needs to help the small businesses that are the true engine of our economy. Right now, freelancers, sole proprietors, unincorporated small businesses and pass-through entities are taxed at the high personal income taxes. This treatment stifles small businesses. It also stifles tax reform because efforts to reduce loopholes and deductions available to the very rich and special interests end up hitting small businesses and job creators as well.” This comes from a man who has used every imaginable tax loophole to avoid paying taxes and keeping his bottom line healthy. He also has shown disdain for small businesses, especially building contractors, when he stiffs them for work they have done on his luxury hotels and casinos.
  • Healthcare: “On day one of the Trump Administration, we will ask Congress to immediately deliver a full repeal of Obamacare,” Trumps said. “We will work with Congress to make sure we have a series of reforms ready for implementation that follow free market principles and that will restore economic freedom and certainty to everyone in this country. I would end Obamacare and replace it with something terrific, for far less money for the country and the people.” 
  • Regulations and regulatory reform: Trump seems to be in agreement with many small business owners that the fewer the regulations the better. He supports the REINS (Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny) Act saying, “I will sign the REINS Act should it reach my desk as PResident and more importantly I will work hard to get it passed. The monstrosity that is the Federal Government with its pages and pages or rules and regulations has been a disaster for the American economy and job growth. The REINS Act is one major step toward getting our government under control.” 
  • US-China trade relationships: Small business owners are divided on trade with China – some are hurt by the current arrangement, others are benefitting from the increased market access. This makes Trump’s plan somewhat vague, trying to be something for everyone. “If you give American worker a level playing field, they will win. At its heart, this plan is a negotiating strategy to bring fairness to our trade with China. The results will be huge for American businesses and workers. Jobs and factories will stop moving offshore and instead stay here at home. The economy will boom. The steps outline in this plan will make that a reality.”  However, as pointed out by Clinton and members of the media, Trump finds the trade agreements beneficial to him, with his clothing line being made in China and Mexico, instead of in states such as Colorado or North Carolina with a history of textile manufacturing.
  • Immigration: Trump’s immigration plan is well-known and often raises eyebrows among thinking human beings – deport everyone who is here illegally and institute a religious-test on persons who attempt to immigrate here in the future. But in the case of economic policy, again small business owners split with Trump on his plans. Tech startups especially, rely on a global talent pool from which to recruit. So it’s unclear how Trump’s policies will affect them. However, Trump adds, “Real immigration reform puts the needs of working people first – no wealthy globetrotting donors. We are the only country in the world whose immigration system puts the needs of other nations ahead of our own. That must change. I will end forever the use of the H-1B visa as a cheap labor program, and institute an absolute requirement to hire American workers first for every visa and immigration program. No exceptions.” However, Trump just applied for hundreds of H-2B visas to supply low-wage cooks, wait staff and janitorial staff for his million dollar club in Florida, Mar-A-Lago Club.

 

This is a Story about Depression

(I didn’t write this, it’s by Elizabeth Esther, but this is pretty accurate.) 

This is what Depression feels like for me: I’m walking along the beach enjoying the sunset when suddenly, a rogue wave rises up from nowhere and smashes down, sucking me underwater, pulling me out to sea. I toss and tumble, swirl in a black vortex. I can’t scream for help because I am choking on saltwater. I can’t swim to the surface because I don’t know which way is up. Worst of all, I don’t know how long this will last.

Hello, there. I didn’t mean to disappear. But Depression is what happened to me last month and I couldn’t tell you because I was busy drowning in it. You were right to be concerned. Thank you for the kind emails, for the “where are you’s?” on social media, for the texts. I’m sorry I couldn’t respond—I’d lost my words and to be honest, I feared they might be gone forever….but I found some words today and so here I am, writing again.

: : :

One morning last month I woke up and couldn’t get out of bed. I wasn’t physically sick but I hurt all over. I had zero energy. I couldn’t stop crying. I couldn’t eat. I couldn’t sleep. I was in such deep emotional pain that I was literally squirming.

I went to a therapist. And then another therapist. And then group therapy. Finally, my husband insisted I call my psychiatrist. I didn’t want to do that. I didn’t want that to be my problem. Not again.

Maybe we just needed to sell the house and move to the country! Maybe I just needed to go back to school! Here, I know: MAYBE I NEEDED TO BECOME A NUN.

Nope.

So, I landed in my psychiatrist’s office. He looked at my chart, raised his eyes to mine and asked why I’d gone off my medication three months ago—without consulting him.

I didn’t want to answer that. I wanted to be sick with something else. I wanted to say: Hey, maybe this is diabetes. Or early menopause! Right, doc? That’s a possibility, isn’t it? This can’t be Depression again. I’ve already talked about and written about all my pain! I’m HEALED, see?

But I didn’t say that.

Instead, I looked at my doctor through puffy eyes and said: “I went off my medication because I thought I was all better. I thought I didn’t need them anymore. I thought I was cured.”

And that’s when he told me I probably should be on anti-depressants for the rest of my life.

: : :

Hello darkness, my old friend. You’ve really humbled me this time. I’m done pretending I don’t know you. This time, I’m taking you seriously. I don’t really have a choice, do I? You made sure of that. You took me down so fast and so hard this last time that I’ll never forget how bad it felt. True, I suspected you were coming. I could sort of feel the storm gathering. Of course, I ran away! That’s what I do. I’ve been trying to get away from you ever since the first time you showed up, back when I was just a little girl.

: : :

It took me almost forty years to get my chronic depression properly diagnosed—mainly because I didn’t think Depression was real.

Mental illness is just not something we Christians talked about when I was growing up.We talked about weak faith, doubt and disobedience. We talk about trusting Jesus, writing gratitude journals and praying more as a way to “increase joy.” But we rarely think of mental illness as a real illness. If we did, we wouldn’t advise our depressed friends to just go for a walk and count their blessings.

My family history is rife with mental illness—most of it unacknowledged and undiagnosed. Mental illness isn’t something we talked about in my family until just recently. Now that we’re naming the shadow that’s plagued our family for generations, it’s easy to see how much of it has been here all along.

As soon you name the shadow, suddenly, you start understanding why you had a maternal grandmother who used to lock herself away for days at a time. You begin wondering if your paternal grandmother’s inability to deal with reality was also sourced in mental illness. Remember how she used to be “sick” for months at a time, confined to her bedroom? Remember how she was forever on the brink of death with some inexplicable illness? When you start acknowledging mental illness as part of your family history, suddenly you really want to talk about your grandmother’s sister: you know, The One We Never Talk About. The one who committed suicide.

I’m not blaming my family for not talking about it. I don’t want to talk about it either.

I understand why we keep silent. It scares us.

Mental illness doesn’t feel manageable like other illnesses. There aren’t vaccines. It isn’t curable or predictable. Courses of treatment aren’t standardized. We don’t talk about mental illness because we can’t contain it with words and thereby control it.

Mental illness reminds us too much of our human limitations. It reminds us too much of our powerlessness. It makes us feel helpless and that helplessness is something we can-do-Christian-Americans try to avoid at all costs.

: : :

It’s taken several weeks, but I’m beginning to stabilize on new medication. The worst has passed and I’m feeling a little better each day.

These little white pills don’t magically fix everything. Basically, medication just levels the playing field. It makes getting out of bed possible. I still have to do my part: get enough rest, eat healthy and exercise. Also, I pray. I’m praying more now than I ever have in my whole life.

I’m learning how to take care of myself again. I’ve re-committed to therapy. (Apparently, it’s not enough to just talk about childhood trauma, you also have to process it out of your body). I’ve set some new boundaries—my tendency is to over-work and burn myself out. I can’t do that anymore. My body just won’t let me.

I’m also trying to make amends…because while I was off my medication I hurt some people I love very much. I wasn’t myself and I was making decisions while emotionally compromised. I owe it to myself and to them to get and stay healthy.

Mental illness has become a larger part of my story and since writing is how I process my life, I suppose writing about mental illness is going to become a larger part of this blog.

I hope you’ll stay awhile.

Tom Barrett’s extortion of St. Marcus

Typically, when Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett opens his mouth, stupid falls out. Case in point – his never-ending idea to create a 2.5-mile trolley using $65 million in federal transportation funds. Or his brilliant idea to create a gun violence hotline when we have a perfectly functional 9-1-1 system.

However, Barrett’s latest idea is not only stupid, it may possibly be criminal.

Late on Thursday, Barrett decided to shake down St. Marcus School for a cool $1.3 million. He said the “tax” would make it more likely that the city would back the school’s efforts to purchase the vacant Lee Elementary School at 9th and Meinecke, currently owned by the Milwaukee Public Schools.

Really Tom? Did you just ask St. Marcus for a bribe? Did you just make them a “deal that can’t refuse?”

Barrett said the $1.3 million, paid over the next decade, would offset the lost revenue to MPS for the choice students that would attend St. Marcus. He said that Milwaukee taxpayers are disproportionately paying for voucher students and that this would help MPS stay financially afloat.

St. Marcus Superintendent Henry Tyson told the mayor no deal.

Responding to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Tyson said, “We won’t pay a tax like that because it’s evident that we bring a huge net benefit to city taxpayers,”

St. Marcus posts some of the best tests scores in the city, with a student body made of mostly poor and African-Americans.

Barrett’s idea is seriously flawed. Taxpayers and voters in Wisconsin have whole-heartedly supported school choice and the funding of it with public dollars. We have seen the results, better test scores, lower high school drop-out rates, higher high school graduation rates and as is the case with Hope Christian High School, 3 years of 100 percent of their graduating seniors enrolling in colleges.

In addition, the people who benefit from St. Marcus are already paying a tax for education, which is simply being diverted from the failing Milwaukee Public Schools to a successful choice school. Why should current and potential St. Marcus families be asked to pay another tax?

To make liberals and school choice opponents happy? Definitely no.

So Tom, take you shakedown politics somewhere else and let St. Marcus have that vacant, money pit called Lee Elementary and allow them to offer a decent education to another 750 students in the inner city. In the end, the benefits will be there for Milwaukee with a highly educated workforce and informed citizenry that will increase the city’s tax base.

A peek at my trip to China

Some photos I shot when I traveled to China in 2012.

What Makes St. Marcus Great

stmarcusfb-635154612373502158

This story first appeared on www.rightwisconsin.com.  

In light of the recent fubar with MPS selling the Malcolm X school campus to a developer for $2.something million and then agreeing to rent it back at $1 million a year, I just wanted to let you know what the commotion is all about.  St. Marcus should have been allowed to buy that school and educate over 900 students who are currently held hostage by the Milwaukee Public Schools.  Here’s a story I did last month following a speech by St. Marcus’ Superintendent Henry Tyson. 

As shared in previous posts, St. Marcus School in Milwaukee is an exceptional Milwaukee Parental Choice school. It regularly scores higher than MPS and other choice or voucher schools on statewide achievement tests and a majority of its students graduate from high school in four years and move onto higher education.

But on Thursday, St. Marcus Superintendent Henry Tyson discussed what exactly makes his school great and why more quality educational seats are needed in our nations urban centers. He also expanded on St. Marcus’ battle with the Milwaukee Public School Board over the purchase of the vacant Malcolm X Academy.

Tyson spoke to an audience at Marquette University as part of the On the Issues series hosted by journalist Mike Gousha.

Tyson didn’t mince words about the focus of the school – Jesus.

“We are mission driven to teach these children that they are children of God through grace alone,” he said. “And that kind of message is reflected in the classroom. When they know they are children of God, they learn they have value. And when they know they personally have value, they start to value others.”

With that mindset, Tyson said students are ready to move from being defensive and aggressive to an attitude of love and respect, which translates into the ability to learn.

While St. Marcus is unapologetically Christian and follows the teachings of the Milwaukee-based Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod, Tyson said there is another focus in the school – no excuses for failure.

“We expect all our students to succeed and to live up to and beyond their potential,” Tyson said. “And we measure that by having all 8th grade graduates ready to excel in high school and graduating within the prescribed four years.”

After tracking graduates for eight years, St. Marcus alumni average a 91 percent graduation rate from high school in four years and another 6 percent graduate from either a GED program or alternative high school. MPS currently has an graduation rate of 62 percent and the state graduates 87 percent of its high school students in four years.

Many school choice naysayers will claim achievement in choice schools and behavior problems are skewed because they don’t have to take special needs students or those students from the worst home situations.

However, six percent, or 50 of St. Marcus’ students are considered special needs with educational or physical disabilities. In addition, 94 percent of students are African-American or Hispanic and are from the most impoverished census tracts in the City of Milwaukee.

To deal with students that come from troubled homes, St. Marcus has instituted some new ideas for the school day. First, the school day is longer, running from 8 a.m. to 4:20 p.m. Second, if a student has a grade point average below 2.0, they have to stay in class until 5 p.m. And for some, with working parents, they stay at school until 9 p.m. enjoying a meal and tutoring until it is time to go home and sleep.

Additionally, St. Marcus holds classes on Saturday mornings and conducts a summer program for four weeks. All this to instill a love of education in both the students and parents and to keep children in school and away from trouble.

The cost for all this? According to Tyson, St. Marcus educates a child for approximately $7,800 per year – including Saturdays, summers and evening programming.

The state’s school voucher program pays $6,500 per student, leaving $1,300 per student to be made up by the school. Not a problem, said Tyson, who credits not-for-profit foundations, community members and the congregation with making up the difference.

On the other side of the ledger, MPS proposed to spend over $14,200 per student during the 2011-12 school year and the state average is $11,774 per student during the same time period.

Tyson also isn’t afraid to put up his students achievement rates on standardized tests, such as the Wisconsin Knowledge and Concepts Exam (WCKE). But he wants people to make sure they are comparing apples to apples when interpreting the results.

He spoke of the breathless reporting by the local newspaper which stated MPS students scored higher than choice schools on the most recent WKCEs. However, the paper compared all MPS students scores (including middle and upper class students) with the scores of only voucher-using students (those below the income standard at the time) at choice and charter schools. This unfairly skewed the results according to Tyson.

Tyson also addressed a recent article written by MTEA President Bob Peterson asking why taxpayers should pay for an education that teaches religious values that promote homophobia and women-hating. This was Peterson’s description of the doctrine and beliefs of the Wisconsin Synod.

Tyson deflected on the scriptural questions, urging Peterson to sit down with St. Marcus’ pastors to answer those; but he described Peterson’s tactic as missing the point.

“According to the story on the BBC (still Tyson’s preferred choice of news, as he is a Brit) there are more blacks in jail here (on average) than elsewhere in the country,” he said. “This is an education issue, where without an quality education they will either end up dead, in jail or unemployed.”

“There is a raging fire in this city and there are many little fire trucks that are trying to put it out with a quality educational product – St. Marcus, Milwaukee College Prep, Bruce Guadalupe – and Peterson is pushing a small distraction instead of paying attention to the fire.”

“I’m focused on education and I think Mr. Peterson should be too,” Tyson added.

In regards to St. Marcus’ efforts to purchase Malcolm X Academy from MPS, Tyson didn’t mince words – he thinks the “plan” to turn the vacant building into a community center is a smokescreen.

They (MPS) is more concerned with their market share than with providing the quality educational seats for the children of this city,” he said.

Some of my photo work

DSC_0531Not only do I write, but I catch life happening in the lens of my camera.  Here are a sampling of some ofwisconsin-capitol-protests1Todd Michael WilcoxLS1_showing-assent-JFC-4-11-11

Democrat Peter Barca and Republican Daniel Knodl join hands during a prayer by Jesse Jackson.
Democrat Peter Barca and Republican Daniel Knodl join hands during a prayer by Jesse Jackson.

Photo by Patti Wenzel

Vice-President Joe Biden addresses the middle class on financial reform at UWM on April 27. Photo by Patti Wenzel

HarleyFest 110 020IMG_9230 wagontravelers2 fire 4.5my favorites: 

madisonladyjusticeLS1-300x199

WI Legislator calls for tuition freeze, UW System president’s resignation

HAN834_nass_200x160Outraged over the recent fiascos within the UW-System (i.e. UW System Surplus and the UW-Milwaukee response to Palermo Pizza protestors), Rep. Steve Nass is calling on the state’s Joint Finance Committee to remove any new funding for the UW System in the 2013-15 biennial budget

Nass (R-Whitewater) is the Chairman of the Assembly Colleges and Universities Committee and he is calling on both the Governor and the Legislature to get serious about addressing the administrative crisis within the UW System.

“I’ve heard from many parents and taxpayers boiling mad about the state’s weak response to the defiant actions of the UW System under the leadership of President Kevin Reilly,” Nass said. “I have concluded nothing will change in the system unless the Governor and Legislature utilize the pursestrings power to compel needed leadership reforms.”

Nass’s solution? A proposal that there be an absolute tuition freeze and no new taxpayer funding for the UW System unless Reilly resigns or is removed by the Board of Regents. He added that Governor Walker’s own appointees to the Board are enabling the incompetence of Reilly and other UW-System administrators.

“President Reilly can no longer be blamed on Jim Doyle. His ability to continue damaging the UW system is now the problem of Governor Walker and his appointees to the Board of Regents,” Nass added.

Nass said his vote on the proposed budget will be determined on how the Joint Finance Committee handles this key factor.

UWM closes down Palermo’s Pizza stand after labor protest

When they couldn’t get their way with the National Labor Relations Board, Voces de la Frontera took to the streets, protesting and picketing Milwaukee-based pizza maker Palermo’s for supposed wage, safety and benefit violations.

 

And while it has gone on since last June, on Tuesday the protest moved to the UW-Milwaukee campus, where Voces and students occupied the Palermo’s pizza stand in the school’s union.

 

According to a blog posted on the Hispanic News Network, five students took over the stand around 11 a.m., closing it down. Another 40-50 students joined the protest, chanting “No justice, no pizza” during the lunch hour on the campus.

 

Many of the students who saw the protest assumed it was disgruntled student workers wanting more pay.

 

“If they don’t like the pay, get a job at the Taco Bell stand next to it,” said one female student who did not want her name used.

 

Another student, Walter Wenzel (full disclosure – this is the writer’s son) said it was about time that students protested the fast food stands in the union.

 

“Palermo’s isn’t a socially conscious citizen,” Wenzel said. “And neither is Taco Bell or Burger King or any of them. It’s time for the school to get rid of these bad corporate actors.”

 

Wenzel will get his wish, since UW-M Vice Chancellor for Student Affairs Jim Hill decided to close Palermo’s stand down through the summer semester. The protest came to an end at 1:15 p.m. when Hill made his decision. He could not be reached for comment regarding his decision.

 

A similar action against Palermo’s was staged at UW-Madison last month, as students took over the interim chancellor’s office in protest against the pizza maker’s products being sold on the campus. The students were taken into custody in Madison and the campus’s chancellor, David Ward, refused to give in to their demands.

 

Voces and disgruntled employees have staged protests at Palermo’s Menomonee Valley manufacturing headquarters and at executive’s homes over the last year after Palermo fired over 50 employees who did not have proper work documentation. The NLRB ruled that Palermo was correct to release the employees and has found no wrong doing on the part of the company.

 

Voces and the employee strikers claim Palermo fired the undocumented workers in retaliation for an attempt to organize a union at the factory. They have also been demanding better wages, safety and more sick time.

 

Palermo’s executives have repeatedly said they would welcome a organizing vote at the plant but that they will not reinstate the undocumented workers. 

Milwaukee board passes their type of reform

CntyBrdRMwThe Milwaukee County Board pushed ahead with its own reform package, sending County Chairwoman Marina Dimitrijevic’s to the County Executive for his approval or veto on a 15-3 vote.

 

Dimitrijevic immediately praised the board’s actions, calling them bold and brave.

 

“This is the kind of local reform our constituents have demanded,” she said. “We listened to everyone – residents, state legislators and community leaders. This bold reform reflects the tone of local input.”

 

“It’s been said that we would never reform the Board, that we would never cut our salaries, and that we would never cut staff. But we’ve done it. This is indeed a new day on the County Board and we have shown leadership in approving this reform package.”

 

Since County Executive Chris Abele has come out publicly in favor of Assembly Bill 85 and its companion bill, Senate 95, it is assumed that the local Dimitrijevic plan will be vetoed. It that occurs, the county board will have the opportunity to override the veto at its May meeting.

 

The plan passed with Supervisors Deanna Alexander, John Weishan Jr and Steve Taylor voting against the measure.

 

Taylor acknowledged he was wrong to support the measure at the committee level on Monday, April, 22, saying after learning of the e-mails between the County Board and AFSCME in violation of Act 10 he knew he could no longer trust the chairwoman.

 

“As I previously stated, Act 10 is the law of the land and if members of the Board are willingly and knowingly violating this law, then how can I honestly trust that they will follow through with the proposed Board reforms.”

 

“This is the first time in my nine-year political career that I can recall where in less than 24 hours after voting on an issue I felt that I made a mistake,” Taylor continued. “Rarely in politics do you get a do-over and I decided to take full advantage of this opportunity, reverse my decision and vote against the Board’s reform proposal.”

 

“Due to what appears to have gone on behind closed doors over the past few months, my confidence in this body and its leadership has greatly eroded. That is why the only chance for real reform to take place in Milwaukee County is for it to occur in Madison,” he added.

 

Weishan wasn’t concerned with the leadership – he actually pledged his support for the leadership of the Board – but his disapproval with the Dimitrijevic plan was that there was a reform plan at all. He felt that the plan was “not real compromise and giving into the extortion from the bullys and gangsters in Madison.”

 

“You are surrendering to the extortionists in Madison,” he said. “What do people in Madison really know about Milwaukee County. This is just a continuation of the racist and bigoted views of Milwaukee County.”

 

In addition to passing their own reform plan, the County Board also passed a resolution panning both AB 85 and SB 95.

 

Supervisor Pat Jursik was the most adamant about stopping the legislation in Madison. She badmouthed Rep. Joe Sanfelippo, saying he didn’t do anything about reform when he was a county supervisor and was a “my way, or highway” kind of guy and that a representative whose district is not solely contained within Milwaukee County is suspect.

 

“Why is AB 85 being sponsored by a Representative whose district is half in Waukesha County?” Jursik asked. “Is this just a way to upset our balance of power so Waukesha can get our water? Is this just a way for Waukesha to get an arena to visit without having to pay for it? He (Sanfelippo) is just trying to upset the balance of power.”

 

Paranoid much, Pat?

 

Prior to the vote on the Dimitrijevic plan, Alexander submitted an substitute resolution, which would have asked the Legislature to maintain the four year terms of supervisors and extend that to all counties in the state; reduce pay to 80 percent of the “median household income” of county residents, or $34,717; allow supervisors to receive health benefits for themselves and allow supervisors to pay for any dependent coverage if desired; to give the Intergovernmental Cooperation Counsel only an non-binding advisory vote on contracts and to clarify the meaning of “day-to-day management” of a department.

 

She asked the the County Board hold a committee of the whole meeting by May 31 to discuss her plan and any others that may come forward before voting on any local plan.

 

The Legislature is considering the reduction of Milwaukee County Supervisor pay to $24,000, while the Dimitrijevic-backed reform plan would reduce pay to $40,500.

 

Alexander’s amendment was widely panned by her fellow board members.

 

“This is just her (Sup. Alexander) cynical attempt to back off her extreme position with the state and now claim middle ground since her constituents are in favor of local reform,” Sup. John Weishan Jr. said. “She’s just creating a future talking point. I think her substitute amendment is inappropriate and I question her character.”

 

Mayo, Sr. said he didn’t believe the board need reform or that there had been any “self-inflicted harm” to the board. He added that he didn’t want to be bullied by the state, the GMC (Greater Milwaukee Committee) or fellow supervisors.

 

Sup. Jim “Luigi” Schmidt didn’t support Alexander’s effort either saying he doesn’t think the board is dysfunctional, as the state has said.

 

“Are we dysfunctional?” he asked. “Yes, because we represent varied interests and are not homogeneous. But if you don’t agree with a board decision doesn’t mean were dysfunctional, it means we have a difference of opinion.”

 

Alexander explained she offered her plan, which seems to be a compromise between the state and the Dimitrijevic plan, in response to Senators asking why the county can’t meet them halfway.

 

“When I was at the hearings this week on SB95 the state talked about wanting local reform, but that they can’t back off completely,” Alexander said. “I’m doing my due diligence to do that, to find cooperation and not be run over and to look for a way to have all the sides heard.”

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑