Some photos I shot when I traveled to China in 2012.
This story first appeared on www.rightwisconsin.com.
In light of the recent fubar with MPS selling the Malcolm X school campus to a developer for $2.something million and then agreeing to rent it back at $1 million a year, I just wanted to let you know what the commotion is all about. St. Marcus should have been allowed to buy that school and educate over 900 students who are currently held hostage by the Milwaukee Public Schools. Here’s a story I did last month following a speech by St. Marcus’ Superintendent Henry Tyson.
As shared in previous posts, St. Marcus School in Milwaukee is an exceptional Milwaukee Parental Choice school. It regularly scores higher than MPS and other choice or voucher schools on statewide achievement tests and a majority of its students graduate from high school in four years and move onto higher education.
But on Thursday, St. Marcus Superintendent Henry Tyson discussed what exactly makes his school great and why more quality educational seats are needed in our nations urban centers. He also expanded on St. Marcus’ battle with the Milwaukee Public School Board over the purchase of the vacant Malcolm X Academy.
Tyson spoke to an audience at Marquette University as part of the On the Issues series hosted by journalist Mike Gousha.
Tyson didn’t mince words about the focus of the school – Jesus.
“We are mission driven to teach these children that they are children of God through grace alone,” he said. “And that kind of message is reflected in the classroom. When they know they are children of God, they learn they have value. And when they know they personally have value, they start to value others.”
With that mindset, Tyson said students are ready to move from being defensive and aggressive to an attitude of love and respect, which translates into the ability to learn.
While St. Marcus is unapologetically Christian and follows the teachings of the Milwaukee-based Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod, Tyson said there is another focus in the school – no excuses for failure.
“We expect all our students to succeed and to live up to and beyond their potential,” Tyson said. “And we measure that by having all 8th grade graduates ready to excel in high school and graduating within the prescribed four years.”
After tracking graduates for eight years, St. Marcus alumni average a 91 percent graduation rate from high school in four years and another 6 percent graduate from either a GED program or alternative high school. MPS currently has an graduation rate of 62 percent and the state graduates 87 percent of its high school students in four years.
Many school choice naysayers will claim achievement in choice schools and behavior problems are skewed because they don’t have to take special needs students or those students from the worst home situations.
However, six percent, or 50 of St. Marcus’ students are considered special needs with educational or physical disabilities. In addition, 94 percent of students are African-American or Hispanic and are from the most impoverished census tracts in the City of Milwaukee.
To deal with students that come from troubled homes, St. Marcus has instituted some new ideas for the school day. First, the school day is longer, running from 8 a.m. to 4:20 p.m. Second, if a student has a grade point average below 2.0, they have to stay in class until 5 p.m. And for some, with working parents, they stay at school until 9 p.m. enjoying a meal and tutoring until it is time to go home and sleep.
Additionally, St. Marcus holds classes on Saturday mornings and conducts a summer program for four weeks. All this to instill a love of education in both the students and parents and to keep children in school and away from trouble.
The cost for all this? According to Tyson, St. Marcus educates a child for approximately $7,800 per year – including Saturdays, summers and evening programming.
The state’s school voucher program pays $6,500 per student, leaving $1,300 per student to be made up by the school. Not a problem, said Tyson, who credits not-for-profit foundations, community members and the congregation with making up the difference.
On the other side of the ledger, MPS proposed to spend over $14,200 per student during the 2011-12 school year and the state average is $11,774 per student during the same time period.
Tyson also isn’t afraid to put up his students achievement rates on standardized tests, such as the Wisconsin Knowledge and Concepts Exam (WCKE). But he wants people to make sure they are comparing apples to apples when interpreting the results.
He spoke of the breathless reporting by the local newspaper which stated MPS students scored higher than choice schools on the most recent WKCEs. However, the paper compared all MPS students scores (including middle and upper class students) with the scores of only voucher-using students (those below the income standard at the time) at choice and charter schools. This unfairly skewed the results according to Tyson.
Tyson also addressed a recent article written by MTEA President Bob Peterson asking why taxpayers should pay for an education that teaches religious values that promote homophobia and women-hating. This was Peterson’s description of the doctrine and beliefs of the Wisconsin Synod.
Tyson deflected on the scriptural questions, urging Peterson to sit down with St. Marcus’ pastors to answer those; but he described Peterson’s tactic as missing the point.
“According to the story on the BBC (still Tyson’s preferred choice of news, as he is a Brit) there are more blacks in jail here (on average) than elsewhere in the country,” he said. “This is an education issue, where without an quality education they will either end up dead, in jail or unemployed.”
“There is a raging fire in this city and there are many little fire trucks that are trying to put it out with a quality educational product – St. Marcus, Milwaukee College Prep, Bruce Guadalupe – and Peterson is pushing a small distraction instead of paying attention to the fire.”
“I’m focused on education and I think Mr. Peterson should be too,” Tyson added.
In regards to St. Marcus’ efforts to purchase Malcolm X Academy from MPS, Tyson didn’t mince words – he thinks the “plan” to turn the vacant building into a community center is a smokescreen.
They (MPS) is more concerned with their market share than with providing the quality educational seats for the children of this city,” he said.
Outraged over the recent fiascos within the UW-System (i.e. UW System Surplus and the UW-Milwaukee response to Palermo Pizza protestors), Rep. Steve Nass is calling on the state’s Joint Finance Committee to remove any new funding for the UW System in the 2013-15 biennial budget
Nass (R-Whitewater) is the Chairman of the Assembly Colleges and Universities Committee and he is calling on both the Governor and the Legislature to get serious about addressing the administrative crisis within the UW System.
“I’ve heard from many parents and taxpayers boiling mad about the state’s weak response to the defiant actions of the UW System under the leadership of President Kevin Reilly,” Nass said. “I have concluded nothing will change in the system unless the Governor and Legislature utilize the pursestrings power to compel needed leadership reforms.”
Nass’s solution? A proposal that there be an absolute tuition freeze and no new taxpayer funding for the UW System unless Reilly resigns or is removed by the Board of Regents. He added that Governor Walker’s own appointees to the Board are enabling the incompetence of Reilly and other UW-System administrators.
“President Reilly can no longer be blamed on Jim Doyle. His ability to continue damaging the UW system is now the problem of Governor Walker and his appointees to the Board of Regents,” Nass added.
Nass said his vote on the proposed budget will be determined on how the Joint Finance Committee handles this key factor.
When they couldn’t get their way with the National Labor Relations Board, Voces de la Frontera took to the streets, protesting and picketing Milwaukee-based pizza maker Palermo’s for supposed wage, safety and benefit violations.
And while it has gone on since last June, on Tuesday the protest moved to the UW-Milwaukee campus, where Voces and students occupied the Palermo’s pizza stand in the school’s union.
According to a blog posted on the Hispanic News Network, five students took over the stand around 11 a.m., closing it down. Another 40-50 students joined the protest, chanting “No justice, no pizza” during the lunch hour on the campus.
Many of the students who saw the protest assumed it was disgruntled student workers wanting more pay.
“If they don’t like the pay, get a job at the Taco Bell stand next to it,” said one female student who did not want her name used.
Another student, Walter Wenzel (full disclosure – this is the writer’s son) said it was about time that students protested the fast food stands in the union.
“Palermo’s isn’t a socially conscious citizen,” Wenzel said. “And neither is Taco Bell or Burger King or any of them. It’s time for the school to get rid of these bad corporate actors.”
Wenzel will get his wish, since UW-M Vice Chancellor for Student Affairs Jim Hill decided to close Palermo’s stand down through the summer semester. The protest came to an end at 1:15 p.m. when Hill made his decision. He could not be reached for comment regarding his decision.
A similar action against Palermo’s was staged at UW-Madison last month, as students took over the interim chancellor’s office in protest against the pizza maker’s products being sold on the campus. The students were taken into custody in Madison and the campus’s chancellor, David Ward, refused to give in to their demands.
Voces and disgruntled employees have staged protests at Palermo’s Menomonee Valley manufacturing headquarters and at executive’s homes over the last year after Palermo fired over 50 employees who did not have proper work documentation. The NLRB ruled that Palermo was correct to release the employees and has found no wrong doing on the part of the company.
Voces and the employee strikers claim Palermo fired the undocumented workers in retaliation for an attempt to organize a union at the factory. They have also been demanding better wages, safety and more sick time.
Palermo’s executives have repeatedly said they would welcome a organizing vote at the plant but that they will not reinstate the undocumented workers.
Dimitrijevic immediately praised the board’s actions, calling them bold and brave.
“This is the kind of local reform our constituents have demanded,” she said. “We listened to everyone – residents, state legislators and community leaders. This bold reform reflects the tone of local input.”
“It’s been said that we would never reform the Board, that we would never cut our salaries, and that we would never cut staff. But we’ve done it. This is indeed a new day on the County Board and we have shown leadership in approving this reform package.”
Since County Executive Chris Abele has come out publicly in favor of Assembly Bill 85 and its companion bill, Senate 95, it is assumed that the local Dimitrijevic plan will be vetoed. It that occurs, the county board will have the opportunity to override the veto at its May meeting.
The plan passed with Supervisors Deanna Alexander, John Weishan Jr and Steve Taylor voting against the measure.
Taylor acknowledged he was wrong to support the measure at the committee level on Monday, April, 22, saying after learning of the e-mails between the County Board and AFSCME in violation of Act 10 he knew he could no longer trust the chairwoman.
“As I previously stated, Act 10 is the law of the land and if members of the Board are willingly and knowingly violating this law, then how can I honestly trust that they will follow through with the proposed Board reforms.”
“This is the first time in my nine-year political career that I can recall where in less than 24 hours after voting on an issue I felt that I made a mistake,” Taylor continued. “Rarely in politics do you get a do-over and I decided to take full advantage of this opportunity, reverse my decision and vote against the Board’s reform proposal.”
“Due to what appears to have gone on behind closed doors over the past few months, my confidence in this body and its leadership has greatly eroded. That is why the only chance for real reform to take place in Milwaukee County is for it to occur in Madison,” he added.
Weishan wasn’t concerned with the leadership – he actually pledged his support for the leadership of the Board – but his disapproval with the Dimitrijevic plan was that there was a reform plan at all. He felt that the plan was “not real compromise and giving into the extortion from the bullys and gangsters in Madison.”
“You are surrendering to the extortionists in Madison,” he said. “What do people in Madison really know about Milwaukee County. This is just a continuation of the racist and bigoted views of Milwaukee County.”
In addition to passing their own reform plan, the County Board also passed a resolution panning both AB 85 and SB 95.
Supervisor Pat Jursik was the most adamant about stopping the legislation in Madison. She badmouthed Rep. Joe Sanfelippo, saying he didn’t do anything about reform when he was a county supervisor and was a “my way, or highway” kind of guy and that a representative whose district is not solely contained within Milwaukee County is suspect.
“Why is AB 85 being sponsored by a Representative whose district is half in Waukesha County?” Jursik asked. “Is this just a way to upset our balance of power so Waukesha can get our water? Is this just a way for Waukesha to get an arena to visit without having to pay for it? He (Sanfelippo) is just trying to upset the balance of power.”
Paranoid much, Pat?
Prior to the vote on the Dimitrijevic plan, Alexander submitted an substitute resolution, which would have asked the Legislature to maintain the four year terms of supervisors and extend that to all counties in the state; reduce pay to 80 percent of the “median household income” of county residents, or $34,717; allow supervisors to receive health benefits for themselves and allow supervisors to pay for any dependent coverage if desired; to give the Intergovernmental Cooperation Counsel only an non-binding advisory vote on contracts and to clarify the meaning of “day-to-day management” of a department.
She asked the the County Board hold a committee of the whole meeting by May 31 to discuss her plan and any others that may come forward before voting on any local plan.
The Legislature is considering the reduction of Milwaukee County Supervisor pay to $24,000, while the Dimitrijevic-backed reform plan would reduce pay to $40,500.
Alexander’s amendment was widely panned by her fellow board members.
“This is just her (Sup. Alexander) cynical attempt to back off her extreme position with the state and now claim middle ground since her constituents are in favor of local reform,” Sup. John Weishan Jr. said. “She’s just creating a future talking point. I think her substitute amendment is inappropriate and I question her character.”
Mayo, Sr. said he didn’t believe the board need reform or that there had been any “self-inflicted harm” to the board. He added that he didn’t want to be bullied by the state, the GMC (Greater Milwaukee Committee) or fellow supervisors.
Sup. Jim “Luigi” Schmidt didn’t support Alexander’s effort either saying he doesn’t think the board is dysfunctional, as the state has said.
“Are we dysfunctional?” he asked. “Yes, because we represent varied interests and are not homogeneous. But if you don’t agree with a board decision doesn’t mean were dysfunctional, it means we have a difference of opinion.”
Alexander explained she offered her plan, which seems to be a compromise between the state and the Dimitrijevic plan, in response to Senators asking why the county can’t meet them halfway.
“When I was at the hearings this week on SB95 the state talked about wanting local reform, but that they can’t back off completely,” Alexander said. “I’m doing my due diligence to do that, to find cooperation and not be run over and to look for a way to have all the sides heard.”
Scott Walker signed the historic mining bill last week, but that doesn’t mean jobs will suddenly materialize in Northern and Southeastern Wisconsin anytime soon. Legal challenges from clean water groups and the Bad River Band of Lake Superior Chippewa will take the place of legislative debate in this long fought battle.
Bad River Chairman Mike Wiggins Jr. promised “active resistance” that will include filing lawsuits to stop the occupation of the mine site. He said the reservation and its waters are sacred and tribal members won’t allow it to be polluted.
Wiggins and the clean water activists assert that the runoff from the mine and the mining process will pollute the sacred waters of the Bad River and eventually Lake Superior. As stewards of the environment, the Bad River Nation has a moral duty to make sure these waters remain unsullied and pristine for themselves and all people.
As Bart Simpson would say, “What a load of crappy, crap, crap.”
Wiggins is an opportunist in the first degree. While he pontificates about the sacred nature of his tribe’s attachment to the water of the Bad River and Lake Superior, his tribal water treatment plant is the worst polluter in the state, dumping untreated water and effluent solids (translation, poop) into the very waters he says his ancestors are making him protect.
Talk about pointing out the stye in the other guy’s eye while there is a log wedged in your own eye, to paraphrase the Holy Book.
And where are all the friends of the water and streams and rivers when Tom Barrett’s water treatment plant is dumping the same crap in the waters of Lake Michigan. Just because there isn’t a reservation in Milwaukee means it’s okay to dump poop and garbage into Southeastern Wisconsin’s source of drinking water? Where are the lawsuits against Barrett and his effluent dumping machine?
I look forward to heading to Mercer or Hurley or Mellen in a few years and seeing these little cities booming from the jobs that will be created from the mine. There is no question that these communities, with unemployment rates hovering in the low teens, will see a transformation with the mine.
But it won’t be in terms of pollution and increased disease. It will be from the jobs and economic growth that will come from a multi-billion dollar ore vein that will finally be allowed to be freed.